I don’t know why reading Harriet Jacobs’s Incidents reminds of Maya Angelou’s
early writing, I know Why the Caged Bird
Sings. Jacobs calls slavery the “cage of obscene birds”. Like Angelou’s
caged bird who “sings of freedom", Jacobs's narrative is also one that actively
pursues freedom (to the point that the narrative becomes fast-paced and itself
mirrors a deep longing for freedom).
Jacobs forces one to reconsider
what freedom means. In the obvious sense of the word, given the context of the
narrative, one would think there is a binary between freedom and slavery and
Jacobs yearns to cross over to the other side from slavery. Yet the narrative
complicates this further. There is a strange oppressiveness that freedom contains
for colored people.Free black men are seen as “half
free niggers” by the white population. Jacobs tells us of a continuing agony
which follows her throughout, “I called myself free, and sometimes felt so; but
I knew I was insecure.” Thus, freedom too is a precarious state. This precarity
is also shaped by a burden that comes with the realization of one’s freedom in
the face of the suffering of others. Jacobs writes “I could never go out to
breathe God's free air without trepidation at my heart.”
Freedom is found in little
things. Jacobs writes that the first thing that she did on the “dawn” of her freedom
was “to see the sun rise, for the first time in our lives, on free soil”. When Jacobs
is in hiding she hates the fact that she is not able to breathe freely. At that
moment while Jacobs movements are restricted she thinks of Dr. Flint who was “out
in the free air, while I, guiltless of crime, was pent up here, as the only
means of avoiding the cruelties the laws allowed him to inflict upon me!” Freedom is not just the grand idea of what freedom at the end of slavery felt
like but it also includes small acts such as the ability to breath freely and
deeply. This freedom also contains the ability to speak and write. About
slaveholders, Jacobs says, “Hot weather brings out snakes and slaveholders, and
I like one class of the venomous creatures as little as I do the other. What a
comfort it is, to be free to say so!” This ability to write is also one
that Dr. Flint found threatening when he would ask Harriet about the lovers
with whom she exchanged letters. Therefore, for Harriet Jacobs to be free is to be able
to breathe and see sunrise and write and speak freely.
These small acts which for Jacobs
are reflective of a person’s freedom show her believe that freedom is a natural
state. Freedom for Jacobs is as natural to man as “the air he breathes” and
anyone who takes that freedom away is “guilty of murder”. It is a search for
freedom from socially acceptable behavior for a young black woman that dictates
Angelou’s narrative too. Both Jacobs and Angelou show that freedom is an
expansive yet precarious state. They also show that to actively create
circumstances that allow for one to be free is the most radical thing one can
do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.