“Reader be assured this narrative is no
fiction” says Harriet Jacobs in the preface of Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. In reading these lines, I
was reminded of another female autobiography The Weave of my Life by Urmila Parvar, which I read some time ago
and it begins “My mother used to weave aaydans, the Marathi generic
term for all things made from bamboo. I find that her act of weaving and my act
of writing are organically linked. The weave is similar. It is the weave of
pain, suffering, and agony that links us.” Though, separated by context and
culture, what I found deeply interesting was the way the woman’s autobiography
displays a palpable consciousness and at times unease with the form in which her
life is to be articulated: ‘What it means to write the gendered self?’ seems to
be a critical question that turns the autobiography into a space of
self-reflexivity. What should female life writing look like? Should it be just
about the self, or does the purpose transcend the self. In the case of Incidents the question is not just
confined to notion of gender since here gender is entwined with racial politics. Incidents then takes the autobiographical
mode to write about Jacob’s own experiences but as she says her story is
painful and she would rather have kept it private, but she feels that
making it public may help the antislavery movement. In this way can we
think of this work as a political or historical document? In what way is this
autobiographical narrative revealing of the subaltern’s resistance. To that end
what can one make of her act to enter into a sexual relationship with Mr.
Sands. Is that a moment of deep vulnerability or an act of resistance even if
it comes at the cost of having to bear two children from Mr. Sands. How does
one extract the voice of the subaltern in such an incident.: She says
that she is ashamed of this illicit relationship but finds it preferable to
being raped by the loathsome Dr. Flint. With Mr. Sands, she has two children,
Benny and Ellen. Linda argues that a powerless slave girl cannot be held to the
same standards of morality as a free woman. She also has practical reasons for
agreeing to the affair: she hopes that when Flint finds out about it, he will
sell her to Sands in disgust. Instead, the vengeful Flint sends Linda to his
plantation to be broken in as a field hand. But can we say that Linda
is making a choice in this case. Is she exhibiting some kind of agency? This also has implications for thinking about the relationship of agency to the form of writing- autobiography
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.